We specialize in advertising campaign optimization, ensuring that your campaigns not only reach the right audience but resonate in the most impactful way possible. Our data-driven approach provides clear insights into how your advertising materials perform, from initial concept to post-launch evaluation. Whether you’re looking to refine the content, design, or overall messaging of your campaign, our suite of services—including content strategy insights, design tests, and campaign pretests—helps you stay ahead of the competition and optimize every aspect of your communication.

With tools like our Campaign Pretest, we predict the impact of your advertising before it goes live, offering valuable benchmarks and feedback for improvement. Additionally, our Campaign Evaluation measures the success of your campaign in real-time, tracking key performance indicators such as brand awareness and customer perception. We provide you with the confidence to make data-backed decisions, streamline the creative process, and achieve measurable success in every advertising effort.

Define the most relevant topics, the best channels and suitable formats for a sustainable dialog with target audiences. This tool provides information for successful content marketing strategies, especially for new or ‘special’ audiences like B2B target groups. A quantitative survey tells us which topics are relevant at the moment, where the perceived competences of the brand are, and which channels and formats are preferred.

TYPICAL QUESTIONS

  • Which problems and interests do customers have that the brand might credibly solve?
  • What are the perceived competences of the brand?
  • Which level of expertise do customers have regarding the topics?
  • How can the topic reach be maximized?
  • Which channels are preferred? (e.g., social media, websites, newsletters, personal contact, trade fairs)
  • Which formats are preferred? (e.g., info graphics, videos, texts, stories)

HOW DOES IT HELP?

  • Reliable information base for content strategies

LIMITATIONS

  • Given the quantitative nature of this tool, a qualitative exploration might be needed to gather possible topics before evaluating them

WHEN TO USE?

  • When a list of topics for content marketing is available

COMBINE WITH

  • A qualitative exploration of topics, a content audit of available assets and capabilities

VARIANTS AND OPTIONS

  • Reach maximization through a TURF analysis
  • Topics condensation with a cluster analysis

Test and optimize visual designs and choose the most preferable variants. When it comes to evaluating matters of taste, a representative survey with at least 300 participants is needed. We carefully choose a sample that represents the target audience and present them with creative stimuli such as screen designs, logos, claims, advertising media, motives, etc.

TYPICAL QUESTIONS

  • Which logo version fits best with the brand values?
  • Which claim is understood best?
  • Are there any unwanted associations?
  • How is a visual design received by the target group? How can it be improved?
  • Which motives / testimonials / images resonate best with the target audience?
  • Are the new assets better than the current ones?
  • Which narrator voices sound better?

HOW DOES IT HELP?

  • Clear base for informed design decisions
  • Discussions with the client can be shortened dramatically if empirical evidence is presented

LIMITATIONS

  • A design test works best when two or more alternatives can be prepared, e.g. old vs. new, or design alternatives. If there isn’t something to compare with, strengths and weaknesses as well as acceptance can speak for themselves

WHEN TO USE?

  • When there are creative ideas that can be visualized

COMBINE WITH

  • A pre-test against a benchmark if the stimuli are advertising media

VARIANTS AND OPTIONS

  • Screen design test, creative asset test, animatic test, claim test, logo test, voice test, video test 

Predict the advertising impact of advertising media in comparison to a benchmark and show how to improve it before the campaign. We test your advertising media in a standardized online survey, quickly, cost-effectively and validly. A variety of formats can be considered: TVC’s, print ads, online/social video, online display, OOH, radio, etc.. The results are compared with an extensive benchmark so specific weaknesses can be fixed before the campaign.

TYPICAL QUESTIONS

  • How memorable is my advertising material?
  • Which motif is the best?
  • Is the advertising message understood?
  • How does the advertising medium compare to the competition?
  • Where are the weak points of the advertising medium, what can be optimized?

HOW DOES IT HELP?

  • Cost-effective and valid insights, quickly available
  • Security before the start of the campaign: Determine best motif or advertising medium
  • Possibility of optimization: What exactly is wrong with the advertising material, where are the weak points?

LIMITATIONS

  • In order to allow benchmarking, the questionnaire must be standardized. Therefore, individual questions can be added, but the main set of questions must not be changed.

WHEN TO USE?

  • As soon as first versions of advertising media are available before campaign start. There should be left enough time to optimize the media (e.g. change layout, captions, video edit)

COMBINE WITH

  • A campaign evaluation to understand the impact on campaign level.

VARIANTS AND OPTIONS

  • The pretest can be upgraded with various modules, e.g. attention tracking, emotion tracking for videos, impact comparisons for various formats and motives, special target groups etc.

Measure the image success of campaigns. In the run-up to the campaign, the first step is usually to record the current status with regard to relevant key performance indicators such as brand image, awareness and advertising recall with the help of an online survey (zero measurement). After the campaign has run its course, a second online survey with similar content is conducted to detect changes in the KPIs (control measurement).

TYPICAL QUESTIONS

  • Was my campaign noticed at all?
  • How was the campaign perceived? Was it successful?
  • Did the campaign result in a stronger bond between my customers and the company?
  • How were individual campaign elements evaluated?

HOW DOES IT HELP?

  • Better understanding of the target groups and their perception of the brand.
  • Direct visibility of the changes: Statements can be made such as "As a result of the campaign, sympathy toward my company has improved by X%."
  • Review of campaign success leads to learnings for future campaigns efficient use and saving of resources during the development of subsequent campaigns

LIMITATIONS

  • A before-after evaluation measures everything that happened in between the survey waves. It can, therefore, not distinguish between different parallel campaigns or media channels.

WHEN TO USE?

  • The campaign evaluation must be set up well before the first campaign flight, in order to run the baseline measurement.

COMBINE WITH

  • Media data, performance reporting

VARIANTS AND OPTIONS

  • Continuous evaluation (= brand tracking) makes sense if different campaigns are run in a year. Also, it makes sense having a permanent success measurement in place that doesn’t need to be commissioned with each new campaign.

The brand tracking (AKA brand tracker, marketing funnel tracking, brand health tracking, marketing performance tracking) continuously monitors brand KPIs from a consumer perspective and establish an early warning system. A continuous, standardized online survey, e.g., nationally representative or focused on specific target groups, determines the status quo of the most important brand and image KPIs. The central aspects of the brand funnel (awareness, recognition, consideration, choice, NPS) are covered. The regular survey makes longitudinal developments over time visible. Unlike sales and distribution data, brand tracking focuses on brand perception from the consumer's point of view.

TYPICAL QUESTIONS

  • How does the awareness and likeability of your brand develop over time, and in comparison to competitors?
  • Is there a need for action regarding brand perception due to current developments?
  • What is the impact of my advertising efforts on brand perception?
  • Are there seasonal fluctuations in key KPIs?
  • Do consumers evaluate the brand as it should appear?

HOW DOES IT HELP?

  • Collection of KPIs to understand the status quo of the brand and as a data basis for marketing and sales
  • Comparison with the closest competitors
  • Verification if target brand values are perceived
  • Number-based overview of brand image developments (instead of "fishing in the dark").
  • (Early) identification of necessary optimizations in the funnel.
  • More efficient allocation of the marketing budget.

LIMITATIONS

  • Whilst brand tracking tells us, what exactly is happening in the perception of the brand, we still don’t know why this is happening. Hence, it makes sense combining it with external data like media spendings of competitors.

WHEN TO USE?

  • For brands that have already reached significant awareness in their target group segments.

COMBINE WITH

  • Media spending data, campaign databases or sales numbers in order to deepen understanding of correlations.

VARIANTS AND OPTIONS

  • Cadence (e.g. monthly, quarterly, half-yearly), market (e.g. general population or market segment), competitors to test against

Case: Yahoo

The effect of Native Advertising Formats

Native advertising is a by now established form of online advertising that is oriented optically and substantively on the regular content, in contrast to the strongly differentiated traditional display formats. In the context of a comprehensive research project for Yahoo Germany, the mode of action of native advertising formats with regard to visibility, acceptance and recognition value was examined. The study combines a quantitative survey with qualitative single interviews and eye tracking. It was differentiated between different Yahoo online advertising environments and between smartphones and PCs as the end devices. The results prove that native advertising formats fare better above-average as concerns the memorability of the advertising contents, while better brand recognition is achieved by display formats. Extremely high values could be measured for the visibility of native formats, both on desktop computers as well as mobile end devices. The study received the Best Practice Award of the German Association for Online Research.

“The flexibility and creative ideas of Facit Digital enabled us to quickly implement this complex research project.”

Kerstin Hammen

Head of Research Germany & On Network EMEA

Yahoo! Deutschland Services GmbH

Let's get in touch!
Michael Wörmann
Michael Wörmann
Managing Partner
Let's get in touch!
Bitte geben Sie eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse ein
Bitte geben Sie eine gültige Telefonnummer ein

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.